Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$181.91 vs CA$223.3
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 51% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 251 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.89 vs CA$1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
66%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19405 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
251
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$223.3
81%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$223.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |