Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 414 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - CA$184.49 vs CA$204.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-9400 - CA$1.35 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 3% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 141 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
137
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$184.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$184.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
141
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
93%
Price, CA$
CA$204
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |