Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1218 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 2% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 106 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$148.31 vs CA$201.47
- Up to 28% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$1.4 vs CA$1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.94/FPS
72%
Price, CA$
CA$201.47
73%
Buy for CA$201.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
106
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$148.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$148.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |