Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 779 vs 750 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$114.99 vs CA$194.24
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
750
96.27727856225931%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
59%
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for CA$114.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
81.22392211404728%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |