Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$194.24 vs CA$222.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 31% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 201 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
153
76.11940298507463%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Buy for CA$222 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
69.27639383155397%
Multi-Core
5794
84.96847045021264%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |