Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2524 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4670K - 182 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - CA$167.65 vs CA$172.21
- Up to 6% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-4670K - CA$0.92 vs CA$0.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3464 minutes ago
Buy for CA$172.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3458 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |