Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the cheaper Core i5-10400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10400 - 61 vs 53 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$174.99 vs CA$222.88
- Up to 10% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10600KF - CA$3.3 vs CA$3.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
61
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.65/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$222.88
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$222.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14597 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
53
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14597 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |