Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2445 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-3770K - 238 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$150.42 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.63 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
238
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$150.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$150.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |