Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 952 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-6900K - 204 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$153.88 vs CA$258.88
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.75 vs CA$1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12513 minutes ago
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |