Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 457 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 528 vs 526 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$303.46 vs CA$389.99
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74108 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
526
99.62121212121212%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
93.29073482428115%
Multi-Core
5794
81.39926945771285%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |