Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-3770K - 542 vs 511 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$329.49 vs CA$350.0
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 20 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74059 minutes ago
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
42.18377088305489%
Multi-Core
2469
29.302159981011155%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |