Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1430 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6900K - 193 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$329.49 vs CA$389.99
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 20 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77949 minutes ago
Buy for CA$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77949 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
74.7016706443914%
Multi-Core
7118
84.47661998575838%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |