Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$388.0 vs CA$389.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900F - 130 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900F - CA$2.99 vs CA$3.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8031 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |