Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$329.49 vs CA$399.23
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900F - 150 vs 134 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
89.33333333333333%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
100%
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77951 minutes ago
Buy for CA$399.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77951 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
70.68747363981443%
Multi-Core
8426
76.96382900986481%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |