Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 17% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3770K - 166 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$200.16 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-3770K - CA$1.21 vs CA$1.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |