Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-3770K - 181 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$178.04 vs CA$350.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73991 minutes ago
Buy for CA$178.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
41.93357058125741%
Multi-Core
2469
36.207655081390236%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |