Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 192 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$178.04 vs CA$303.46
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$178.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74262 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
92.70833333333334%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
58%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74263 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
69.27639383155397%
Multi-Core
5794
84.96847045021264%
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |