Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 981 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - CA$182.45 vs CA$208.62
- Up to 8% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700 - CA$1.22 vs CA$1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
149
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
92%
Price, CA$
CA$208.62
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$208.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |