Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$182.45 vs CA$346.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Control than Core i5-14400 - CA$0.92 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than FX-8350 - 206 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
199
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$346
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |