Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14500 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-14500 - CA$182.45 vs CA$339.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-14500 - CA$0.85 vs CA$1.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Performs up to 14% better in Death Stranding than FX-8350 - 243 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
214
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10753 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
243
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$339
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-14500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |