Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14500 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14500 is 2321 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 213 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$1.54 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-14500 - CA$303.46 vs CA$329.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |