Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2426 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 55% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-2600K - 45 vs 29 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$170.45 vs CA$194.24
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
45
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Buy for CA$170.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
57.1917808219178%
Multi-Core
2320
40.04142216085606%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |