Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $47.48 vs $120.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-10320 - $0.27 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Pentium G6950 - 183 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
178
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14067 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |