Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-6200 - 180 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $42.85 vs $265.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-11900K - $0.3 vs $1.47 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |