Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Minecraft than FX-8120 - 825 vs 596 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $39.99 vs $265.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900K - $0.07 vs $0.32 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |