Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2572 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-4460T - 128 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $48.75 vs $276.74
- Up to 78% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-11900K - $0.47 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
21.759259259259256%
Price, $
$276.74
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $276.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
104
81.25%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Single-Core
802
33.82539013074652%
Multi-Core
2190
20.00365363536719%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |