Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2985 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 30% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-6200 - 136 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $42.85 vs $259.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i9-10900F - $0.41 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
21%
Price, $
$259.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 3 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |