Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i3-7350K - 89 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $51.6 vs $259.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i9-10900F - $0.59 vs $2.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.92/FPS
20%
Price, $
$259.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |