Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G550 - 181 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $49.0 vs $250.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - $0.31 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |