Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2985 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Ready or Not than FX-6200 - 275 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $42.85 vs $235.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-10700K - $0.18 vs $0.86 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
20%
Price, $
$235.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |