Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 18% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - 268 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $39.9 vs $230.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-10700K - $0.18 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14420 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |