Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $39.9 vs $230.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-7700K - $0.12 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 51 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3900 - 354 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
322
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8645 minutes ago
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8646 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |