Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $39.9 vs $209.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-14400F - $0.27 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3900 - 165 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
21%
Price, $
$209.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |