Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1610 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $37.0 vs $235.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Control than Core i7-10700K - $0.19 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
16%
Price, $
$235.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |