Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 15% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 781 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-7350K - $37.0 vs $51.6
- Up to 29% better value when playing Valorant than Core i3-7350K - $0.05 vs $0.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 55 vs 60 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4196 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |