Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1282 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 9% better in Saints Row than FX-6200 - 158 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $42.85 vs $100.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i3-6100 - $0.3 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2182 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |