Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1187 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Celeron G550 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $49.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-6100 - $0.34 vs $0.67 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100)
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18536 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18535 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
