Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 2184 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i7-860 - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $48.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-6100 - $0.25 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16889 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |