Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 490 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3930T - 123 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $39.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-6100 - $0.35 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2554 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2553 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |