Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240T outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240T is 189 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6200 - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than FX-6200 - $25.7 vs $42.85
- Up to 41% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6200 - $0.17 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 6 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17068 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |