Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 36% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $25.7 vs $39.9
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-3240T - 109 vs 106 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75390 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
76.93631669535283%
Multi-Core
971
97.88306451612904%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |