Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 686 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $25.7 vs $48.5
- Up to 42% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-4370 - $0.22 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-3240T - 128 vs 116 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17370 minutes ago
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17371 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |