Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 897 days older than the more expensive Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400T - 128 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $48.5 vs $52.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400T - $0.38 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |