Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240T outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240T is 91 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1610 - 600 vs 598 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $25.7 vs $37.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Minecraft than Celeron G1610 - $0.04 vs $0.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
600
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15401 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |