Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220T is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G1610 - 223 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $37.0 vs $80.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3220T - $0.17 vs $0.36 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |