Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2498 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $59.4 vs $81.14
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3220T - 255 vs 234 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for $81.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
43.536121673003805%
Multi-Core
941
31.23133089943578%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |