Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $59.4 vs $84.95
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 59% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3220T - 375 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Buy for $84.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
30.800268997982517%
Multi-Core
941
20.416576263831633%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |