Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G3930 - 227 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $63.92 vs $86.43
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $86.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77836 minutes ago
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
40.88769334229993%
Multi-Core
1043
22.629637665437187%
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |