Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1583 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3220T - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $63.92 vs $80.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3220T - $0.38 vs $0.48 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |