Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2498 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $80.0 vs $98.15
- Up to 7% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.52 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 13% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3220T - 174 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5579 minutes ago
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |